1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 29 N.J.
  5. 29 N.J. Super. 285 (1954)
 

VAN TUYL v. FEDERAL SHIPBUILDING, ETC., CO.

29 N.J. Super. 285 (1954)

102 A.2d 399

WILLIAM VAN TUYL, PETITIONER-APPELLEE, v. FEDERAL SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Hudson County Court Law Division.

Decided January 7, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harold Krieger, attorney for petitioner-appellee (Mr. Aaron Gordon, of counsel).

Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Horner, attorneys for respondent-appellant.

DREWEN, J.C.C.

This is an appeal from a determination in the Bureau that respondent provide certain medical treatment for petitioner. The question submitted, strictly speaking, is one of novel impression. The main contention is that prior determinations are a legal bar to the aforementioned award. A chronological statement is therefore in order. It is undisputed that on July 29, 1942 petitioner was injured in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases