1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 32 N.J.
  5. 32 N.J. Super. 278 (1954)
 

N.J. STATE BD. OF OPTOMETRISTS v. LICHTMAN

32 N.J. Super. 278 (1954)

108 A.2d 289

NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF OPTOMETRISTS AND JOHN J. BROWN, INSPECTOR, NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF OPTOMETRISTS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM M. LICHTMAN, O.D., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 4, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Robert W. Criscuolo argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Parker, McCay and Criscuolo, attorneys).

Mr. William K. Miller, Deputy Attorney-General, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General, attorney).

Before Judges DAVIDSON, HUGHES and PINDAR.

DAVIDSON, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

This is an appeal by a licensed optometrist from the decision and order of the New Jersey State Board of Optometrists suspending his license to practice for 30 days by reason of the violation of N.J.S.A. 45:12-11 and the rules of the Board duly promulgated thereunder.

Specifically, the Board found that appellant had violated the provisions of N.J.S.A. 45...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases