1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 201 Or.
  5. 201 Or. 103 (1954)
 

MARTINOLE v. DELEPINE

201 Or. 103 (1954)

268 P.2d 1040

MARTINOLE v. DELEPINE

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed April 7, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rollin E. Bowles, of Portland, argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were Weiser & Bowles, of Portland.

Kermit Smith, of Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Virgil Crum and Collier, Bernard, Bernard & Edwards, of Portland.

Before LATOURETTE, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, LUSK and BRAND, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

Action for fraud in the sale of corporate stock. Defendants are charged with conspiracy to cheat plaintiff. A jury awarded plaintiff $15,000, the amount of money he paid for the stock, and $5,000 punitive damages. There is an abundance of evidence of fraud

[201 Or. 104]
and of a conspiracy on the part of defendants to defraud plaintiff. It therefore became a jury question.

We have carefully examined...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases