1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 33 N.J.
  5. 33 N.J. Super. 267 (1954)
 

MARTIN v. CESTONE

33 N.J. Super. 267 (1954)

110 A.2d 54

BROOKS C. MARTIN, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWN OF BLOOMFIELD, NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ANTHONY CESTONE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 3, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. David A. Rappeport argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Thomas J. Markey, attorney).

Mr. Murray A. Laiks argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Heller & Laiks, attorneys).

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CLAPP, S.J.A.D.

The issue here — involving the law of zoning — is whether a nonconforming right to use a parcel of land for the storage outdoors of heavy equipment, is to be limited to that portion of the parcel which was used for that purpose when the zoning ordinance was adopted. The County Court, on appeal from a municipal court, held that in using the remainder...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases