Per Curiam.
Respondent is charged with professional misconduct for failing to prosecute claims for personal injuries on behalf of two separate clients from whom he accepted retainers on a contingent basis in January, 1948, and April, 1948, respectively. He informed these clients that their claims were being properly taken care of when actually he took no steps in their prosecution and allowed the Statute of Limitations to run against them. Respondent was also...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.