1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 126 F.Supp.
  5. 126 F.Supp. 154 (1954)
 

CLAUDIO v. SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 14413.

126 F.Supp. 154 (1954)

Julio CLAUDIO, Plaintiff, v. SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

August 6, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick Travers, New York City, for plaintiff.

Purdy, Lamb & Catoggio, New York City, for defendant. Vincent A. Catoggio, New York City, of counsel.

BRUCHHAUSEN, District Judge.

The cases submitted by the plaintiff are not in point. The recoveries therein were after trial. There is no authority for the relief sought, by way of a summary proceeding or motion, excepting where there is no genuine issue of fact, the Courts have entertained motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S. C.A. See Rackus v. Moore-McCormack, D.C., 85 F.Supp. 185; Brady...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases