1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 14 N.J.
  5. 14 N.J. 186 (1954)
 

SPOERL v. PENNSAUKEN TP.

14 N.J. 186 (1954)

101 A.2d 855

CLARENCE E. SPOERL, JR., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF PENNSAUKEN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 11, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Neil F. Deighan, Jr., argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Evoy, Feinberg and Deighan, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas F. Salter argued the cause for respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by WACHENFELD, J.

The inquiry here is whether a covenant in a deed for real estate, given by a municipality, releasing the property from further assessment for benefits, is legal or ultra vires. The question is centered in an action brought by owners of premises in the Township of Pennsauken, wherein they seek an order restraining the township officials from collecting the subject assessment and its cancellation as to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases