The restrictive provision in paragraph "6" of the order was not consented to by petitioner-appellant, and is clearly improper. It should not have been made part of the court's order.
Order unanimously modified by striking therefrom paragraph "6" and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.