The employer was engaged in the business of dyeing and printing textiles, employing claimant as a washer. In the course of his work he was exposed to toxic fumes from a "slop washer". It is not disputed that he inhaled the fumes and that he was at least temporarily disabled thereby. The issue here is the absence of evidence that the continuing conditions from which claimant was found to be suffering were caused or aggravated by his exposure to such fumes. That issue turns...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.