Judgment affirmed, with costs.
The judgment in a prior action brought by the owner of the premises against all the parties to the present action determined that the sublease was null and void because the use for which it was given was in violation of the certificate of occupancy for the property. That judgment was binding on plaintiff in this action. (Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. Nieberg Realty Corp., 250 N.Y. 304; Cook v. Conners, 215 N.Y. 175.) Accordingly...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.