Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Appellant alleged in his complaint that his application for retirement, which was made on the basis of twenty years of service, and the acceptance thereof by respondents, who awarded him a pension based on such service, occurred under a mutual mistake of fact as to appellant's physical condition. In our opinion the documentary proof submitted by respondents on their motion for summary judgment established...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.