Order denying appellants' motion to consolidate actions affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondent Lichtenstein.
There was no abuse of discretion by Special Term in denying the motion, in view of the fact that Action No. 1 is on the nonjury calendar and trial is imminent, while considerable time must elapse before Action No. 2, on the jury calendar, can be reached for trial. Under the circumstances presented, consolidation would prejudice a substantial...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.