1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 114 F.Supp.
  5. 114 F.Supp. 869 (1953)
 

HEARTY v. RAGUNDA

114 F.Supp. 869 (1953)

HEARTY et al. v. RAGUNDA et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

September 29, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Purrington & McConnell, New York City, for libelants.

Haight, Deming, Gardner, Poor & Havens, New York City (Tallman Bissell, New York City, of counsel), for respondents.

WEINFELD, District Judge.

This is a libel in admiralty against the S. S. Ragunda in rem and against Norton, Lilly & Company in personam to recover damages in connection with the shipment of certain pears received by the vessel at Buenos Aires, Argentina, for delivery to libelants in New York.

The libel is in customary form except for Articles Sixteenth and Seventeenth, as to which respondents filed exceptions which are now before the Court for disposition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases