1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 111 F.Supp.
  5. 111 F.Supp. 846 (1953)
 

OSBORN MFG. CO. v. NEWARK BRUSH CO.

Civ. No. 224.

111 F.Supp. 846 (1953)

OSBORN MFG. CO. v. NEWARK BRUSH CO.

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

March 30, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Snevily & Ely and Addison C. Ely, Westfield, N. J., Oberlin & Limbach and John C. Oberlin, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel, for plaintiff.

Stoddard & Stoddard and Frederic Stoddard, Irvington, N. J., Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Barrows & Taylor and George E. Middleton, New York City, of counsel, for defendant.

HARTSHORNE, District Judge.

This is an action by plaintiff, Osborn Manufacturing Company, for the infringement by defendant, Newark Brush Company, of the Peterson patent 2,388,867 applied for March 23, 1942, granted November 13, 1945. The patent is as to a method of treating brushes or brush sections generally of Tampico bristles, which, when revolved, are used to polish and shape metals and plastic articles. The treatment consists of impregnating them with a tacky...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases