1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 117 Cal.App.2d
  5. 117 Cal.App.2d 810 (1953)
 

KIENTZ v. HARRIS

Docket No. 8417.

117 Cal.App.2d 810 (1953)

257 P.2d 44

VICTOR VINCENT KIENTZ, Respondent, v. ARTHUR O'DELL HARRIS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

May 15, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hoge & Fenton, Verne Summers and Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon for Appellant.

C. Ray Robinson for Respondent.

VAN DYKE, P.J.

In Kientz v. Harris, 3 Civil No. 8418 (ante, p. 787 [257 P.2d 41]) we held that upon the facts stated the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction in this court to entertain the same. Motion to dismiss this appeal has been made upon the same ground. The facts in each case as to jurisdiction are identical. There is no need, therefore, to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases