1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 120 Cal.App.2d
  5. 120 Cal.App.2d 802 (1953)
 

BACCUS v. KROGER

Docket No. 15569.

120 Cal.App.2d 802 (1953)

262 P.2d 349

ALICE BACCUS, Respondent, v. F.C. KROGER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

October 26, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keith, Creede & Sedgwick and Scott Conley for Appellant.

Healy & Walcom and Leo J. Walcom for Respondent.

BRAY, J.

Plaintiff obtained a jury verdict judgment against defendant Kroger and the city and county of San Francisco in the sum of $4,000 for personal injuries suffered. Kroger alone appeals.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

1. Was it prejudicial error to permit expert testimony as to the unsafe condition of the sidewalk?

2. Was the use in 11 instructions of the words "dangerous or defective condition" error?

EVIDENCE

No attack is made...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases