MATTER OF DAVID


281 A.D. 509 (1953)

In the Matter of McDowring David (Admitted as James H. M. David), an Attorney, Respondent In the Matter of Urith B. Josiah, an Attorney, Respondent Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Petitioner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 21, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George G. Hunter, Jr., of counsel (Frank H. Gordon, attorney), for petitioner.

McDowring David and Urith B. Josiah, respondents in person.

DORE, J. P., COHN, VAN VOORHIS and BREITEL, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

These attorneys practice under the firm name of "David & Josiah", although they assert that, as between themselves, they are not partners. The learned Referee, to whom numerous charges against respondents or either of them had been referred, reported that, in every instance in which proof was offered, charges have been sustained that respondents grossly violated the canons of professional ethics, that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases