DE LEON v. CAPLAN


204 Misc. 535 (1953)

Margery M. De Leon, Appellant, v. Amiel Caplan, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

May 14, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lyman Stansky for appellant.

Sidney Advocate and E. Edan Spencer for respondent.

WALSH, MURPHY and UGHETTA, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

The court was in error in holding that tender was a condition precedent to the beginning of the cause of action for fraud. The provisions of section 112-g of the Civil Practice Act dispense with this requirement.

The judgment and order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and motion for a new trial granted, with $20 costs to plaintiff to abide the event.

Judgment and order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases