1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 27 N.J.
  5. 27 N.J. Super. 40 (1953)
 

NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY CO. v. POPOVICH

27 N.J. Super. 40 (1953)

98 A.2d 693

NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NICHOLAS POPOVICH, SR., AND NICHOLAS POPOVICH, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS N. POPOVICH & SON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 24, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Reuben P. Goldstein argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Arthur E. Dienst argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Waxman & Waxman, attorneys).

Before Judges STEIN, PROCTOR and CONLON.

The opinion of the court was delivered by STEIN, S.J.A.D. (temporarily assigned).

This appeal is from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court, Law Division, Essex County, pursuant to Rule 3:56 in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants Nicholas Popovich, Sr., and Nicholas Popovich, Jr., individually and trading as N. Popovich & Son, in a suit in which the plaintiff sought contribution from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases