1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 109 F.Supp.
  5. 109 F.Supp. 535 (1953)
 

GAGE v. UNITED STATES

No. 49461.

109 F.Supp. 535 (1953)

GAGE v. UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

February 3, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward S. Irons, Washington, D. C., for the plaintiff. Hamer H. Jamieson, Los Angeles, Cal., was on the briefs.

H. L. Godfrey, Washington, D. C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. Holmes Baldridge, for the defendant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, MADDEN and HOWELL, Judges.

WHITAKER, Judge.

The first ground of plaintiff's motion for relief from the judgment heretofore entered in this court, 103 F.Supp. 1022, 122 Ct. Cl. 160, is that the judgment is erroneous because of the provisions of section 286 of Public Law 593, 82d Congress, 2d Session.

Public Law 593 was an Act "to revise and codify the laws relating to patents and the Patent Office, and to enact into law title 35 of the United States...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases