1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 11 N.J.
  5. 11 N.J. 541 (1953)
 

HOFFMANN-LaROCHE INC. v. WEISSBARD

11 N.J. 541 (1953)

95 A.2d 398

HOFFMANN-LaROCHE INC., A BODY CORPORATE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MAX WEISSBARD AND HARRY WEISSBARD, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS WEISSBARD BROS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 2, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph H. Stamler argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Lorentz & Stamler, attorneys).

Mr. Sanford Freedman argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Samuel Kaufman and Mr. John M. Kaufman on the brief; Messrs. Bilder, Bilder & Kaufman, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by HEHER, J.

We have here a proceeding in equity under the New Jersey Fair Trade Act (R.S. 56:4-3, et seq.) for the recovery of damages to good will and property of $10,000 ensuing, as is said, from the advertising, offering for sale, and the sale by the defendant retail druggists at stores in Newark, New Jersey, of trademarked and branded pharmaceutical preparations and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases