DAILEY v. SCHATZ

No. C. 10757.

113 F.Supp. 437 (1953)

John F. DAILEY, Jr., plaintiff, v. Morris SCHATZ, also known as Murray Schatz, defendant.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

July 2, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jennings & Kenney, New York City, (Joseph C. Kenney, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Abraham M. Feinstein, Brooklyn, N. Y., for defendant.


BYERS, District Judge.

By notice of motion dated June 9, 1953, served the following day and filed nine days later, the plaintiff seeks to amend the recitals in the opinion filed May 12, 1953 which were stated to be sufficiently explicit factually to render findings unnecessary; however, it was also therein stated: "If the attorneys are of a different view, findings may be noticed for settlement."

None were, but defendant noticed a judgment for settlement on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases