IN RE TANNENBAUM

Docket Nos. 2900, 2901, 15673, 15674.

115 Cal.App.2d 394 (1953)

252 P.2d 54

In re JOSEPH TANNENBAUM, on Habeas Corpus. In re CARL E. BROWN, on Habeas Corpus. JOSEPH TANNENBAUM, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent. CARL E. BROWN, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

January 16, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Golden for Petitioner Joseph Tannenbaum.

Leslie C. Gillen and Sol A. Abrams for Petitioner Carl E. Brown.


THE COURT.

The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.

The court is of the opinion that the rule of People v. Talle, 111 Cal.App.2d 650 [245 P.2d 633], applying Statutes of 1871, page 319, was not here violated. (See, generally, In re Lemon, 15 Cal.App.2d 82 [59 P.2d 213]; United States v. Price, 163 F. 904.) [1] We are further...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases