1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 13 N.J.
  5. 13 N.J. 36 (1953)
 

DE CARO v. DE CARO

13 N.J. 36 (1953)

97 A.2d 658

THOMAS J. DE CARO, MARY FERRANTE, AND JEAN WARGACKI, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. FRANK DE CARO, ALSO KNOWN AS FORTUNATO DE CARO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 1, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Julius E. Kramer argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Messrs. Chandless, Weller & Kramer, attorneys; Mr. Ralph W. Chandless, of counsel).

Mr. Samuel A. Larner argued the cause for the plaintiffs-respondents (Mr. Morris Pashman, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, J.

The defendant appeals, pursuant to certification granted by this court (11 N.J. 332 (1953)), from the Appellate Division's reversal of the trial court's judgment denying specific performance of a settlement agreement between the parties. See De Caro v. De Caro, 22 N.J.Super. 463 (1952).

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases