1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 119 F.Supp.
  5. 119 F.Supp. 362 (1953)
 

ROBERTS v. EATON

119 F.Supp. 362 (1953)

ROBERTS v. EATON et al.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

Judgment Affirmed April 5, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry H. Shepard, New York City, for plaintiff, Murray C. Bernays, Ellis J. Freedman, New York City, of counsel.

Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, for defendants, Joseph S. Eaton, Jerome A. Eaton, Miriam Eaton Girard, Lillian K. Eaton [wife of Joseph S. Eaton] Oscar Eaton, Lillian Eaton [wife of Oscar Eaton], Herbert A. May and Philip A. Batchker, Inzer B. Wyatt, Wm. Ward Foshay, Francis Elwood Barkman, New York City, of counsel.

Judgment Affirmed April 5, 1954. See 212 F.2d 82.

GODDARD, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendants for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

The action is brought pursuant to Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Title 15 U.S.C.A. § 78p(b), to recover for the Old Town Corporation [later referred to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases