1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 160 Ohio
  5. 160 Ohio St. 296 (1953)
 

BAUMAN v. HOGUE

No. 33375.

160 Ohio St. 296 (1953)

BAUMAN, APPELLANT, v. HOGUE, ADMR., ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 9, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Newcomer, Newcomer & Shaffer, for appellant.

Mr. Lorin L. Hogue, for appellee Lorin L. Hogue, administrator.

Mr. Charles T. Stahl and Messrs. Weaver & Weaver, for appellee Edwin M. Walter.

TAFT, J.

The questions raised on this appeal are (1) whether the Probate Court has jurisdiction of such an action and (2) whether the defendant may take the amount set off to him pursuant to Section 10509-54, General Code, as assets of decedent's estate exempt from administration.

By reason of our recent decision in In re Estate of Morrison, 159 Ohio St. 285, 112 N.E.2d 13, we are of the opinion that the answer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases