1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 115 F.Supp.
  5. 115 F.Supp. 302 (1953)
 

UNITED STATES v. SHAUGHNESSY

115 F.Supp. 302 (1953)

UNITED STATES ex rel. LEE KUM HOY et al. v. SHAUGHNESSY.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

September 17, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hong & Gim, New York City, Benny Gim, New York City, of counsel, for relators.

J. Edward Lumbard, U. S. Atty., New York City, Harold R. Tyler, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Max Blau, Attorney, Immigration and Naturalization Service, New York City, of counsel, for respondent.

DIMOCK, District Judge.

The three relators in this habeas corpus proceeding are natives of China who claim United States citizenship by virtue of the United States citizenship of the man whom they allege to be their father. They have been excluded from entry on the ground that this relationship has not been proved. They raise, among others, the point that they were denied due process in the introduction and use of reports of blood grouping tests in the proceedings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases