DUNCAN, J.
In support of his petition the plaintiff asserts that the defendant is under a plain duty (Goodell v. Woodbury, 71 N.H. 378, 381) to pay the expense of maintenance and care of the Kula children by reason of the provisions of R. L., c. 127, s. 10. Relying upon Plymouth v. Haverhill, 69 N.H. 400, the defendant maintains that since the parents have been found capable of furnishing support up to thirty dollars a week...
Let's get started
![Leagle.com](https://www.leagle.com/images/logo.png)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.