GROSS v. MacCORNACK

No. 5307.

75 Ariz. 243 (1953)

255 P.2d 183

GROSS et ux. v. MacCORNACK et ux. MacCORNACK et ux. v. GROSS et ux.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

March 23, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles P. Elmer, of Kingman, Shute & Elsing, of Phoenix, for appellants.

Carl D. Hammond, of Kingman, Clark & Clark, of Phoenix, for appellees.


UDALL, Justice.

The primary question before us is which of the parties to this appeal are lawfully entitled to the right to the use of the waters of Willow Spring, a small seep or spring in the Cerbat Range, 3 1/2 miles northwest of Kingman, Arizona. The lower court determined the issues in favor of the appellees, John F. Gross and his wife, Bertha L. Gross. The appellants E.A. MacCornack and his wife, Harriet MacCornack, have appealed. This review is of the record...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases