1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 112 F.Supp.
  5. 112 F.Supp. 199 (1953)
 

HEINTZ v. OHIO CAS. INS. CO.

No. 13892.

112 F.Supp. 199 (1953)

HEINTZ v. OHIO CAS. INS. CO. et al.

United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division.

May 4, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard Horwin and Wolfson & Essey, by Leonard Horwin, Beverly Hills, Cal., for plaintiff.

Parker, Stanbury, Reese & McGee, by White McGee, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. and Larry Clark.

TOLIN, District Judge.

This case was removed to the District Court from the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles. Jurisdiction in this Court is claimed to exist because of diversity of citienship. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332:

"Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy "(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases