1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 12 N.J.
  5. 12 N.J. 281 (1953)
 

IN RE NEW PROPOSAL OF JERSEY & NEW YORK R. CO.

12 N.J. 281 (1953)

96 A.2d 526

IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSAL OF THE NEW JERSEY AND NEW YORK RAILROAD COMPANY TO DISCONTINUE OPERATION OF TRAIN NO. 613 BETWEEN JERSEY CITY, NEW JERSEY, AND SPRING VALLEY, NEW YORK, EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1, 1951.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 4, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Justin W. Seymour argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Seymour & Seymour, attorneys; Messrs. McLanahan, Merritt & Ingraham of the New York bar, on the brief).

Mr. Sam A. Colarusso argued the cause for the respondent Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen.

Mr. Maurice A. Walsh, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent Boroughs of Park Ridge, Montvale, et al. (Messrs. Fahy & Walsh, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by VANDERBILT, C.J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Superior Court affirming an order of the Board of Public Utility Commissioners denying permission to the New Jersey and New York Railroad Company to discontinue operation of westbound passenger train No. 613 leaving Jersey City, New Jersey, at 4:45 P.M. daily except Saturdays, Sundays and holidays.

The run in question extends from Jersey...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases