1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 28 N.J.
  5. 28 N.J. Super. 1 (1953)
 

DRISCOLL v. BURLINGTON-BRISTOL BRIDGE CO.

28 N.J. Super. 1 (1953)

99 A.2d 829

ALFRED E. DRISCOLL, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND THEODORE D. PARSONS, ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, INFORMANTS AND PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BURLINGTON-BRISTOL BRIDGE COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. MILTON M. UNGER AND ADRIAN M. UNGER, PARTNERS TRADING AS MILTON M. AND ADRIAN M. UNGER, APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 23, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Milton M. Unger argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Milton M. and Adrian M. Unger, attorneys).

Mr. Paul N. Belmont argued the cause for receivers (Messrs. Van Riper & Belmont, attorneys).

Mr. Robert L. Hood argued the cause for Burlington County Bridge Commission.

Before Judges CLAPP, GOLDMANN and EWART.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CLAPP, S.J.A.D.

This is an appeal by Milton M. and Adrian M. Unger, counsellors, seeking to sustain an assignment made to them in their own right.

In Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co., 8 N.J. 433 (1952), appellants represented 12 defendants there designated as the selling syndicate. The syndicate and Fitzgerald & Co. Inc. (over which the court has not acquired jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases