1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 27 N.J.
  5. 27 N.J. Super. 254 (1953)
 

DIEPEVEEN v. LARRY VOGT, INC.

27 N.J. Super. 254 (1953)

99 A.2d 329

NEAL DIEPEVEEN, T/A NEAL BULB CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LARRY VOGT, INC., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 10, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Charles W. Symanski argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Robert W. MacQuestein, on the brief).

Mr. Samuel J. Davidson argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Alfred Gliedt, attorney; Mr. Otto Venino, Jr., of counsel; Mr. Nelson H. Tegrarian, on the brief).

Before Judges CLAPP, GOLDMANN and EWART.

The opinion of the court was delivered by EWART, J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Bergen County District Court entered against him. There is no reference in the Appendix to a judgment except two forms of judgment submitted by counsel to the court which were not adopted by it. Rule 1:7-2 requires that there be printed as a part of the Appendix in all causes the judgment under review. Nor is there included in the Appendix findings of fact and conclusions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases