In view of plaintiff's claim that there was no available market for the goods in question at the agreed time and place of shipment, plaintiff was entitled to introduce evidence of the market price of equivalent merchandise obtainable elsewhere. It was error to exclude plaintiff's proof on that subject. In the absence of a foreign market where equivalent merchandise could be procured, plaintiff's damages...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.