1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Minn.
  4. 240 Minn.
  5. 240 Minn. 9 (1953)
 

DUFFY v. VILLAGE OF PRINCETON

No. 36,057.

240 Minn. 9 (1953)

MARK G. DUFFY AND OTHERS v. VILLAGE OF PRINCETON AND OTHERS.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 10, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard M. Paulson, Briggs, Gilbert, Morton, Kyle & Macartney, and Frank Hammond, for appellants.

Clarence C. Mitchell, Faegre & Benson, and Charles B. Howard, for respondents.

FRANK T. GALLAGHER, JUSTICE.

Appeal from an amended judgment of the district court whereby it was determined in substance that all action taken by the defendant members of the public utilities commission of the village of Princeton was in accordance with the provisions of the statutes of the state of Minnesota with respect to public contracts.

On December 26, 1951, the public utilities commission of Princeton, referred to hereinafter as the commission, retained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases