1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 111 F.Supp.
  5. 111 F.Supp. 111 (1953)
 

AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO. v. BETTENS

No. 14204.

111 F.Supp. 111 (1953)

AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO. OF HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT, v. BETTENS.

United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division.

March 31, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burton A. VanTassel, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Sylvan G. Bay, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant.

TOLIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment must be denied. As insisted upon by plaintiff, it is apparent from the record of this action that the controlling facts are before the Court without dispute. However, they do not spell out the result which plaintiff desires. Defendant, while not contesting the material facts, insists that they compel a different result than plaintiff contends on his Motion For Summary Judgment. Defendant does not ask summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases