Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.
All concur, except
I think that on the face of this policy, John Stopera, or any other layman under similar circumstances, could consider that he was a "named insured". This is so, particularly by reason of item 1 of the contract, the line which reads "The named insured is Housewife (Husband Chef, Faxton...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.