The action was to recover damages for an alleged assault. The trial court sustained "as to form" an objection to a question propounded by plaintiff's counsel to a physician pertaining to causal relation. Appellant contends that this ruling was erroneous, and raises no other question on this appeal. The ruling, even if erroneous, was not such a prejudicial error as to require a new trial under the circumstances present. The trial court charged the jury without exception that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.