1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 116 F.Supp.
  5. 116 F.Supp. 3 (1953)
 

HARGROVE v. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS

Civ. No. 2639-53.

116 F.Supp. 3 (1953)

HARGROVE et al. v. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS et al.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

November 3, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dickson R. Loos, Merrill Shephard, Chicago, Ill., and Willis S. Ryza, Washington, D. C., Pope, Ballard & Loos, Washington, D. C., William H. Billings, Kennett, Mo., of counsel, for plaintiffs.

Edward J. Hickey, Jr., Washington, D. C., Mulholland, Robie & Hickey, Washington, D. C., of counsel, for defendants.

PINE, District Judge.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground (1) that the court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action, and (2) that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Plaintiffs are two individuals who sue on behalf of themselves and other persons similarly situated. Defendants are the Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co., the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, and the Brotherhood of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases