Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent.
The case appears to present a proper situation for a claim-over under section 193-a of the Civil Practice Act in that the cross claim is sufficiently related to the main action by a common question of law and fact. Though the cross claim does not expressly allege a sale of any dyes by appellant to respondent, it does allege that there were express warranties made by appellant to respondent...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.