The only testimony adduced in support of the allegation that appellant conspired to cause a dice table to be brought to certain premises and there to remain to be used for gambling purposes and to be transferred to other places in the village for that purpose, merely was that of the accomplice Fagnani that appellant had approved storage of a dice table. No conspiracy was shown and the alleged approval for storage only was not unlawful. No proof at all was adduced in support...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.