1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 122 F.Supp.
  5. 122 F.Supp. 911 (1953)
 

KINSMAN TRANSIT CO. v. DUNHAM TOWING & WRECKING CO.

No. 3536.

122 F.Supp. 911 (1953)

KINSMAN TRANSIT CO. v. DUNHAM TOWING & WRECKING CO.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

September 9, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Johnson, Branand & Jaeger, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner.

C. A. Schipfer, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent.

FREED, District Judge.

I am unable to agree with the conclusion reached in Puget Sound Tug and Barge Co. v. The Go-Getter, D.C. 1952, 106 F.Supp. 492. It is unnecessary to belabor the construction of the phrase in question or to engage in a lengthy discussion of semantics. It is sufficient to say that the words "any civil action", as used in 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a), are broad enough, in my view, to embrace actions in Admiralty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases