1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 108 F.Supp.
  5. 108 F.Supp. 899 (1953)
 

UNITED MATTRESS MACH. CO. v. HANDY BUTTON MACH. CO.

Civ. A. 1322.

108 F.Supp. 899 (1953)

UNITED MATTRESS MACHINERY CO., Inc. v. HANDY BUTTON MACH. CO.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

January 5, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Ennalls Berl and David F. Anderson (of Berl Potter & Anderson), Wilmington, Del., and Cedric W. Porter and Nathan Heard (of Heard, Smith, Porter & Chittick), Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Thomas Cooch (of Connolly Cooch & Bove), Wilmington, Del., and Dugald S. McDougall, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

RODNEY, District Judge.

This is an action to enjoin patent infringement on Mathewson patent No. 2,421,280, granted on May 27, 1947, for tufting buttons and assigned to the plaintiff, United Mattress Machinery Company, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "United").

United is a corporation of the State of Maine with its principal place of business in Quincy, Massachusetts. The defendant, Handy Button Machine Company (hereinafter called Handy Button), is a corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases