1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 108 F.Supp.
  5. 108 F.Supp. 897 (1953)
 

TELECHRON, INC. v. PARISSI

Civ. 3831.

108 F.Supp. 897 (1953)

TELECHRON, INC. et al. v. PARISSI.

United States District Court N. D. New York.

January 7, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Whalen, McNamee, Creble & Nichols, Albany, N. Y. (Charles E. Nichols, Albany, N. Y., Fish, Richardson & Neave, New York City, Charles H. Walker and Henry J. Zafian, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Andros & Smith, Albany, N. Y. (Harry Smith, Albany, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant.

FOLEY, District Judge.

A new involvement arises in this difficult and protracted litigation. A sufficient background is given in Telechron, Inc., and General Electric Co. v. Parissi, 2 Cir., 197 F.2d 757, to portray the events leading to the present problem.

Since the above decision, the defendant patentee herein moved for leave to file and serve an amended answer and counterclaim. My order dated December 15, 1952, granted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases