Orders unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents, upon the ground that the petition was defective and appellant's proper remedy was not by mandamus but by appeal.
Whether the tenant was obligated to pay the costs as well as the rent to avoid the issuance of a warrant of eviction is determinable upon appeal and not by an article 78 proceeding (see Matter of Jasgold Realty Corp v. De Stefano, 280 App. Div. 772, in which this court...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.