1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ga.
  4. 208 Ga.
  5. 208 Ga. 729 (1952)
 

BROOME v. SHROPSHIRE

17693, 17695.

208 Ga. 729 (1952)

69 S.E.2d 201

BROOME v. SHROPSHIRE, et vice versa.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided February 13, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hicks & Culbert and Maddox & Maddox, for plaintiff in error.

Dudley B. Magruder Jr. and Wright, Rogers, Magruder & Hoyt, contra.

DUCKWORTH, Chief Justice.

1. On the former appearance of this case in this court (Shropshire v. Broome, 207 Ga. 313, 61 S.E.2d 284), the bill of exceptions was dismissed because the overruling of a demurrer to the caveat was not a final judgment, and the judgment that the caveat alleged a good defense became the law of the case.

2. The evidence offered by the caveator was sufficient...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases