1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ga.
  4. 208 Ga.
  5. 208 Ga. 698 (1952)
 

BAKER v. HENDERSON

17690.

208 Ga. 698 (1952)

69 S.E.2d 278

BAKER et al. v. HENDERSON, by next friend, et al.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided February 11, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mitchell & Mitchell and J. G. B. Erwin, for plaintiffs in error.

Y. A. Henderson, James Maddox, R. F. Chance, R. Carter Pittman, J. B. Langford, Warren Akin, Solicitor-General, and Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, contra.

CANDLER, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is said in the brief filed by counsel for the plaintiffs in error that the only question presented for decision by the writ of error is whether or not these complaining petitioners have any interest in the establishment and probate of a copy of Jimmie Henderson's purported will. As to this, opposing counsel concur and so do we. Concededly, if these petitioners will not be injured or benefited by the establishment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases