1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 102 F.Supp.
  5. 102 F.Supp. 789 (1952)
 

LEISY v. UNITED STATES

Civ. No. 970.

102 F.Supp. 789 (1952)

LEISY v. UNITED STATES.

United States District Court D. Minnesota, Fifth Division.

February 26, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred J. Hughes, St. Cloud, Minn., for plaintiff.

C. U. Landrum, U. S. Atty., and William W. Essling, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Paul, Minn., for defendant.

DONOVAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act1 to recover damages for the destruction of mink on plaintiff's fur farm on the north shore of Birch Lake, near Hackensack, Minnesota.

Defendant denied liability. The matter was tried and submitted on briefs.

It is undisputed that plaintiff operated a fur farm and owned the mink in question. There is nothing in the evidence contradicting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases