1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 108 F.Supp.
  5. 108 F.Supp. 598 (1952)
 

CROOK v. UNITED STATES

Nos. 46000, 46269.

108 F.Supp. 598 (1952)

CROOK et al. v. UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

December 2, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Prentice E. Edrington, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs. William B. Wolf, Washington, D. C., was on the briefs.

C. Blake Townsend, New York City, with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. Holmes Baldridge, for defendant. T. Hayward Brown, Washington, D. C., is on the brief.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, MADDEN and HOWELL, Judges.

WHITAKER, Judge.

These cases are before us on defendant's motion for a new trial. In both suits, numbered 46000 and 46269, plaintiffs seek compensation for the infringement of United States Patent No. 1,645,643, issued October 18, 1927, to Louis H. Crook and Herman Jakobsson. The two suits cover different periods of infringement.

The cases were heretofore submitted to the court on the question of the defendant's liability, reserving the question of the amount...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases