McGOHEY, District Judge.
The case was reopened on libelant's motion, in order to receive orally the opinion of a doctor whose written report had previously been received in evidence. The oral testimony did not differ from the report, except that the doctor testified that he necessarily had to depend to a large degree on the answers and statements made to him by the libelant whom he thought to be truthful. As appears in the opinion previously filed,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.